The Art of Deception: Comparing Pathological Lying in Leadership – Ruto, Trump, and Historical Lessons
Introduction
Leadership demands trust, but what happens when leaders habitually distort the truth? In recent years, Kenya’s President William Ruto and former U.S. President Donald Trump have faced accusations of pathological lying, with critics arguing their falsehoods undermine governance. From Ruto’s unfulfilled economic promises to Trump’s staggering tally of false claims, their behaviors raise questions about why some leaders lie compulsively and what history teaches us about such figures. This blog explores the psychology of pathological lying in leadership, compares Ruto and Trump through specific examples, and draws on historical precedents to assess their impact.
The Psychology of Pathological Lying in Leaders
Pathological lying—habitual, often motiveless deception—can stem from personality disorders like narcissism or psychopathy, or from learned behavior reinforced by power. Psychologists note that narcissistic leaders lie to inflate their image or dodge accountability, while those with psychopathic traits may lie impulsively, indifferent to consequences. For some, lying is strategic, a tool to manipulate narratives or maintain control. But when does this cross into pathology, and what drives leaders to risk credibility?
Case Study 1: William Ruto’s Promises and Public Distrust
Since taking office in 2022, Kenyan President William Ruto has faced accusations of lying about economic reforms and governance. A prominent example is his 2022 campaign promise to lower living costs and stabilize the Kenyan shilling. Ruto claimed his “bottom-up” economic model would create jobs and reduce taxes. Yet, by 2024, fuel prices soared, taxes increased, and the shilling weakened, sparking protests. Critics, including former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, labeled Ruto a “pathological liar” after a 2025 interview where Ruto allegedly fabricated details about their fallout, including claims Gachagua demanded KSh 10 billion for political loyalty. Gachagua’s retort on X—“pathological lying is a mental disorder”—reflects public frustration.
Ruto’s defenders argue his exaggerations are political rhetoric, not pathology, and that economic challenges are global. However, repeated unfulfilled promises, like the 2023 pledge to deliver 1 million jobs annually, erode trust. Social media on X shows Kenyans mocking Ruto’s claims, with hashtags like #RutoMustGo trending in 2024. This suggests a pattern of overpromising that borders on compulsive, possibly driven by a need to maintain populist appeal.
Case Study 2: Donald Trump’s Avalanche of Falsehoods
Donald Trump’s presidency (2017–2021) set a benchmark for documented deception. The Washington Post tallied 30,573 false or misleading claims over his first term, averaging 21 per day. Examples include his 2020 election fraud claims, dubbed the “Big Lie,” which fueled the January 6 Capitol riot. Trump repeatedly asserted he won the election, despite recounts and court rulings proving otherwise. Another notable falsehood was his 2017 claim that his inauguration crowd was the largest ever, contradicted by photos and official estimates.
Trump’s lies often served self-aggrandizement or deflection. He boasted of “the biggest tax cuts in history” (false) and dismissed COVID-19’s severity, claiming it would “disappear.” His former chief of staff, John Kelly, called him a “pathological liar,” and mental health experts like Dr. Bandy Lee noted his lies lacked the strategic purpose of past presidents, suggesting a compulsive trait. Trump’s repetition of falsehoods, like the election fraud narrative, exploited the “illusory truth effect,” where repeated lies gain believability.
Historical Context: Lessons from Past Liars
History shows that lying leaders are not new, but their motives and impacts vary. Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, a fabricated attack on U.S. ships, justified Vietnam War escalation, costing millions of lives. Unlike Trump or Ruto, Johnson’s lie was strategic, tied to national security, though catastrophic. Similarly, Richard Nixon’s Watergate cover-up involved lies to protect power, but his resignation showed accountability absent in modern cases.
In contrast, Ronald Reagan’s falsehoods, like claiming trees caused more pollution than cars, stemmed from detachment rather than malice. These historical figures highlight a spectrum: strategic lies (Johnson), self-serving lies (Nixon), and careless exaggerations (Reagan). Ruto and Trump lean toward the self-serving and compulsive, with Trump’s volume and Ruto’s populist overpromises distinguishing them.
Comparing Ruto and Trump
- Volume and Style: Trump’s lies are more frequent and blatant, averaging 21 daily falsehoods, while Ruto’s are fewer but tied to specific promises. Trump’s style is bombastic, often absurd (e.g., claiming he never said “lock her up” despite recordings), while Ruto’s are aspirational, promising unfeasible economic miracles.
- Motivation: Both lie to bolster their image. Trump’s falsehoods often protect his ego (e.g., crowd sizes) or sow division (e.g., election fraud). Ruto’s aim to sustain populist support, promising jobs and tax cuts despite fiscal realities. Both show narcissistic traits, prioritizing self-preservation over truth.
- Impact: Trump’s lies had global consequences, undermining U.S. democracy via the Capitol riot. Ruto’s erode domestic trust, fueling protests and economic discontent. Both destabilize, but Trump’s disinformation scale, amplified by media, outstrips Ruto’s localized impact.
Are They Good Leaders?
Good leadership requires integrity, vision, and results. Pathological lying undermines all three. Ruto’s economic mismanagement and broken promises suggest ineffective governance, though his supporters credit his infrastructure projects. Trump’s tax cuts and foreign policy wins earned loyalty, but his lies fractured trust and polarized the U.S. Historically, leaders like Franklin Roosevelt lied strategically (e.g., hiding WWII preparations) but delivered results. Ruto and Trump’s lies, often self-serving, lack such justification, making them poor leaders by ethical standards.
Why Do They Lie?
- Inherited or Upbringing? No evidence confirms genetic lying, but narcissistic traits have a heritable component. Trump’s father, Fred, lied about his Swedish heritage, a falsehood Donald repeated. Ruto’s background as a self-made politician suggests learned behavior, possibly from Kenya’s patronage-driven politics.
- Fear of Truth? Both avoid accountability. Trump’s election fraud lies dodged defeat, while Ruto’s job promises deflect economic failures. Their lies shield vulnerabilities, a hallmark of narcissistic leadership.
- Cultural Enablers: Weak accountability—Kenya’s corrupt systems, U.S. partisan media—emboldens lying. Trump’s base embraced his “sincerity” over facts, while Ruto’s supporters tolerate exaggerations for tribal loyalty.
Conclusion
Ruto and Trump exemplify how pathological lying can define leadership, but history warns of its dangers. From Johnson’s Vietnam disaster to Nixon’s downfall, lies erode trust and destabilize societies. Ruto’s broken promises and Trump’s disinformation campaigns show that compulsive deception, whether narcissistic or strategic, undermines effective governance. For citizens, the lesson is clear: demand accountability and skepticism, lest democracy becomes, as Hannah Arendt warned, a place where “nobody believes anything anymore.”
Call to Action
Have you noticed similar patterns in other leaders? Share your thoughts below, and let’s discuss how we can hold power to account. For more on leadership and truth, subscribe to our newsletter!
Sources
- The Washington Post Fact Checker on Trump’s false claims.
- TUKO.co.ke on Ruto-Gachagua fallout.
- Historical analyses from The Nation and The Conversation.
- Psychological insights from Forbes and Psychoanalyzing Life.
Note: This blogpost critically examines public accusations and documented evidence, avoiding unverified claims. Dates and examples are accurate as of April 19, 2025.
- SHA: Emergency Evacuation and International Referrals – Access to Critical Care
Spread the loveSHA: Emergency Evacuation and International Referrals – Access to Critical Care Life-Saving Transportation and Overseas Treatment Coverage Medical emergencies don’t always happen near quality healthcare facilities, and some conditions require treatment unavailable in Kenya. The TSC-POMSF scheme includes comprehensive evacuation and international referral benefits to ensure you can access the care you need,… - SHA: Dental and Optical Benefits – Caring for Your Smile and VisionSpread the loveSHA: Dental and Optical Benefits – Caring for Your Smile and Vision Comprehensive Coverage Beyond General Medical Care The TSC-POMSF scheme recognizes that complete healthcare extends beyond treating illnesses—it includes maintaining your dental health and vision. Here’s what’s covered for all teachers, regardless of job group. Dental Benefits – KSh 45,000 Per Year…
- SHA: Maternity Coverage – Comprehensive Care for Growing FamiliesSpread the loveSHA: Maternity Coverage – Comprehensive Care for Growing Families Supporting Teachers Through Pregnancy and Childbirth The TSC-POMSF scheme recognizes that welcoming a new child is one of life’s most significant events, and it provides comprehensive maternity coverage to ensure both mother and baby receive quality care without financial stress. Who Qualifies for Maternity…
- SHA: Outpatient Benefits Decoded – Your Day-to-Day Medical CoverageSpread the loveSHA: Outpatient Benefits Decoded – Your Day-to-Day Medical Coverage Accessing Healthcare Without Hospital Admission While inpatient coverage handles major medical events, outpatient benefits are where most teachers will interact with their medical scheme regularly. These are the services you can access without being admitted to a hospital—and the TSC-POMSF scheme’s outpatient coverage is…
- SHA: Inside Your Inpatient Coverage – Hospital Care Benefits ExplainedSpread the loveSHA: Inside Your Inpatient Coverage – Hospital Care Benefits Explained Everything You Need to Know About Hospital Admission Benefits When serious illness or injury strikes, knowing exactly what your medical cover includes can provide peace of mind during challenging times. The TSC-POMSF scheme offers comprehensive inpatient coverage that goes far beyond basic hospitalization….
- SHA: Your Benefits Breakdown – What Every Teacher Gets Based on Job GroupSpread the loveSHA: Your Benefits Breakdown – What Every Teacher Gets Based on Job Group Understanding Your Medical Cover Limits The new TSC medical scheme offers graduated benefits based on job groups, ensuring that all teachers receive substantial coverage while recognizing career progression. Here’s your complete guide to understanding what you’re entitled to: The Benefits…
- TSC Unveils Comprehensive Medical Cover for All Teachers Starting December 2025Spread the loveTSC Unveils Comprehensive Medical Cover for All Teachers Starting December 2025 In a significant move towards implementing the National Policy on Universal Health Care, the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) has announced a comprehensive medical coverage scheme for all teachers and their dependents, effective December 1st, 2025. Historic Healthcare Initiative The TSC has contracted…
- Tragedy Strikes KJSEA Marking Exercise as Examiner Dies at Machakos Girls High SchoolSpread the loveNairobi, Kenya – November 24, 2025 The Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) has announced the death of one of its examiners during the ongoing Kenya Junior School Education Assessment (KJSEA) marking exercise. The Incident Mr. Nicodemus Mutua Mutuku passed away this morning at Machakos Girls High School, where he was serving as a…
- Shadows of Empire: How the West Maintains Control in Africa
Spread the loveMore than six decades after the wave of African independence, a troubling pattern persists. While colonial flags have been lowered and new anthems composed, the exploitation hasn’t ended—it has simply evolved. This is neocolonialism: the art of maintaining empire without the embarrassment of occupation. The term, coined by Ghana’s founding president Kwame Nkrumah,… - Why Senator Okiya Omtatah Wants to Abolish the Bomas National Tallying Centre (And Why It Matters for 2027)
Spread the loveOn 24 November 2025, Busia Senator and serial public-interest litigant Okiya Omtatah Okoiti walked into the Constitutional and Human Rights Division of the High Court in Nairobi and dropped a bombshell: Constitutional Petition E757 of 2025. In plain language, he is asking the court to declare the entire concept of a National Tallying…
